The Boardroom Save
How a Financial Director turned a licensing crisis into a competitive advantage—in 3 weeks.
Request Your Forensic AuditPersonalise This Story
Enter your cost per Named User to see the numbers recalculated for your environment. All figures below will update automatically.
The Emergency
Monday morning. The email arrives from the reseller: a standard multi-x SYSPRO migration estimate. Your company—a 150-person plastics manufacturer in Pinetown—has been operating on a concurrent licensing model.
The numbers hit different when they're for real.
- 312 operator IDs on file × [your cost per user] each = [total quoted cost]
- Add implementation costs
- Add training costs
- Total: [full migration cost]
- Your current spend: [current annual cost] per year
- Increase: [multiplier]
The boardroom erupts. The CEO asks the question everyone's been thinking: "Why are we still on SYSPRO?"
Finance Director, all eyes on you. You have three weeks to present alternatives. Your credibility is on the line.
Start Your Free Audit
Discover exactly how your SYSPRO licences are being used.
The Second Opinion
Wednesday. Your operations team mentions a firm called linqIQ. Sceptical? Absolutely. Another vendor trying to sell you something. But the complimentary forensic audit—with full platform access for ongoing monitoring—is hard to refuse. You're ready to understand exactly what you own.
linqIQ begins their analysis. Not a sales pitch. Not a pitch deck. Pure data.
48 hours later, the picture shifts.
- 312 operator IDs on file
- 87 are inactive: ex-employees, duplicates, test accounts
- 225 genuinely active users remain
- 57 casual users: one login per quarter for read-only reports
- 168 users who actually need full access
The forensic analysis reveals the true nature of your licensing problem: you're not paying for 312 users. You're paying for bloat. And the standard quote was based on operator records, not actual usage patterns.
The Presentation
Friday afternoon. Board meeting round two. This time, you walk in with data, not guesses. The FD's presentation includes a Value-Bridge dashboard showing exactly what your true licensing position could be.
Here's what you show the board:
- 168 real users × [your cost per user] = [actual annual cost] per year
- Your current spend: [current annual cost]
- Difference: [manageable increase]—and you get 48 modules instead of 8
- Cost per module (old model): [old cost per module]/module
- Cost per module (new model): [new cost per module]/module
The room goes quiet. Then the CEO asks the question that changes everything: "What else can we do with these modules?"
The Strategy Session
Three months later. The migration is locked in. But something unexpected happened: the board started asking what other modules you should activate. Not to save money. To make money.
Enter what you currently pay for each third-party system to see your potential displacement savings:
- Quality Management Module: Replaced separate QMS system — /year
- Contact Management Module: Replaced standalone CRM platform — /year
- Embedded Analytics: Replaced external BI tool — /year
- Document Management: Replaced standalone DMS — /year
- Project Costing: Replaced external project management tool — /year
The financial position: Base cost adjusts to your actual user count. But you've displaced [enter your costs above] in third-party spend. Net position? You could be ahead—with five new competitive capabilities driving efficiency gains, faster decision-making, and customer visibility.
The CEO's new question isn't "Why are we on SYSPRO?" It's "What module should we activate next?"