The Hidden Workforce Case Study

799 Operators. 252 Real Users.

How a 200-person automotive parts manufacturer discovered they were paying for 547 unused accounts.

[Your Savings]
In unnecessary licensing costs — enter your cost per user below to calculate
R /year

All figures update automatically based on your input

Start Your Audit
01

"The Email" — Panic

The notification arrives on a Tuesday morning. HR pulls the user list from SYSPRO. 799 operator accounts. The CFO does the mental math.

799 users × [your cost per user]/annum = [total annual cost]

The board meets. Voices rise. Talk of switching ERPs entirely. "Why are we paying for 800 people when we only have 200?" No one has the answer. The reseller quotes a Named Subscription migration based on the standard 2x multiplier — even that multi-x ratio doesn't save enough. Something is deeply wrong with the data.

Start Your Free Audit

Discover exactly how your SYSPRO licences are being used.

02

"The Archaeology" — Discovery

linqIQ begins the forensic audit. Layer by layer, the dormant operators are uncovered. It's archaeology, not just data analysis.

The 799 Melts Away
127
Ex-Employees
89
Duplicate IDs
43
Test Accounts
180
Integration Robots
439
Total Inactive

These accounts had never triggered a login event in years, or were system-generated integration points that never should have been Named Users.

127 ex-employees from the last 5 years, never removed from the system. Their shifts ended; their user IDs lingered. 89 duplicate accounts — shift workers who'd been given morning and afternoon IDs because the original provisioning process hadn't deduplicated them. 43 test and training accounts from implementations, never cleaned up. And 180 integration robots — automated jobs, middleware connectors, batch processes, and SYSPRO's own system accounts — provisioned as Named Users when they should have been service accounts.

The pattern emerges: over 5 years of organic growth, mergers, and system changes, the operator list had become a backlog of obsolete IDs. No one had audited it. No one had cleaned it. It was easier to let them sit than to maintain hygiene.

03

"The Reckoning" — The Truth

The real number emerges. Not 799. Not even 360 (those who'd logged in within 12 months). 252 genuinely needed Named Users, after removing duplicates, casuals sharing shifts, and integration accounts.

Blind Quote vs. Forensic Reality
Standard Quote (Unaudited)
799 users
× [your cost]/annum
[total cost]
After Forensic Audit
252 users
× [your cost]/annum
[actual cost]
Savings: Annual Budget Freed
[potential savings]
Enter your cost per user above to see calculated figures

But the story doesn't end at cost savings. The P95 concurrency (peak simultaneous users during busy periods) was just 41. They'd never needed 799 licences. They'd never needed 360. They'd needed 252, and even that was a comfortable cushion above actual demand.

The CFO recalculates the board presentation. Instead of an 18-month ROI conversation, they're looking at capital freed today. Money they can invest in growth, or redirect to other digital initiatives.

04

"The Awakening" — The Real Power

With 252 clean, verified Named Users, something unexpected happened. They began activating modules they'd ignored for years.

48 modules. Fully licensed. Finally, worth exploring.

BOM
MRP
WIP
SQM
CMS
PRJ
CSH
EAM
GEN
APS
ARS
INV
POR
SOR
EFT
CFG
SWS
SEA
+30 more

Manufacturing modules (BOM, MRP, WIP) they'd never activated. Quality Management (SQM), which they'd been doing in spreadsheets for three years. Contact Management (CMS), which they'd been paying separately for. Projects and Contracts. Enterprise Asset Management. They'd licensed all 48 modules, but treated SYSPRO like a single silo because the organisation had only ever seen the dormant accounts, not the real users.

Once the dust settled, with 252 properly licensed, fully supported users, they weren't cheaper — they were exponentially more valuable. Each real user suddenly had access to the full platform. Training budgets went down (fewer, cleaner accounts to maintain). Support tickets dropped (integration robots no longer generated phantom errors). And the supply chain, quality, and customer-facing workflows finally had their tools in the same system.

The CFO's significant savings became the CEO's war chest for the next three modules they'd never dared to enable.

Real Stories. Real Impact.

Third-Party Data Disclaimer

All third-party data, statistics, pricing, and information referenced on this website and within the linqIQ platform are sourced from publicly available materials at the time of publication. Linqit Solutions (Pty) Ltd does not guarantee the continued accuracy, completeness, or currency of any third-party information and accepts no liability for changes made by third parties after the date of reference. Users are advised to verify all third-party data independently.

Images, Pricing & Savings Disclaimer

All images, screenshots, pricing figures, cost comparisons, and savings estimates displayed on this website are for illustrative purposes only. They do not represent actual client results, guaranteed outcomes, or real-world findings. Actual results will vary depending on each organisation's specific licensing environment, data quality, and vendor terms. Nothing displayed should be construed as a commitment, guarantee, or promise of any particular financial outcome.